Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Friday, June 17, 2011

Spotify positioned to compete directly with Apple and Pandora in music.

With its new funding round, Spotify will compete directly with Apple and Pandora. In my last post, I purposefully did not mention Spotify as they were not available in the U.S. market, nor did they have the funding to compete - but now they do. Apple will have their hands full once Spotify and Pandora ramp things up in the next 6 months.

There is no doubt that the future of music will be subscription vs. ownership. One could argue that Apple really doesn't care about 'owning' access to music via iTunes and that it only created this marketplace in order for them to sell more hardware. Amazon is the one most vulnerable, as it does not own a player nor the hardware. Either way, the economics of the music business will continue to shift in a very big way.

Spotify, Gearing Up For U.S. Launch, Closes Its $1 Billion Round

 

Posted via email from Jared Hendler

Thursday, June 09, 2011

In music-Apple's competition is not Google or Amazon-it's Pandora!

All of you Apple fans who have been clammering for subscription to come to iTunes, that's what Pandora is, and more...especially if you are looking for the social sharing promised by Apple's Ping.

The future of music is not ownership, it's subscription. That's what the cloud is for - not to store a copy of all the music you already own for access elsewhere, but it's a cute & expensive idea. Apple cannot have missed that, but I'm not sure that the data-center approach Apple has taken is the right strategy. Pandora, with it's peer-to-peer model, may win the war. It certainly is much farther ahead of Apple, especially with it's streamed licensing arrangements with the big music labels. When the labels figure it out, their fees will plummet as they race to prop up a true Apple competitor.

Pandora's IPO could not be better timed. The liquidity that an IPO brings will give Pandora much deeper pockets to compete in this arena.

Let the games begin.


Written with Essay on iPad

-------------------
Jared Hendler

O: +1-212-704-9727
M: +1-917-754-9520
F: +1-212-704-0917
-------
For the sake of the environment, please think before you print. Thank you.
-------

Posted via email from Jared Hendler

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

The debate over mobile Apps and why they make no sense...

So let me get this straight. Mobile Apps developed simply because mobile screens where too small to accommodate all the functionality of a webpage and needed their own UI. So, instead of simply creating intelligent web services that better recognized mobile devices in order to serve up the best experience necessary we have become slaves to apps that are simply facades of webpages with the same data calls.


In other words Apps are simply mobile bookmarks with a customized UI. But, unlike my bookmarks I cannot organize them as well as I can within a browser and to add insult to injury we have to pay for them too! Imagine that..paying for bookmarks!

There is a good reason that we have to pay. We have to pay because someone has to pay for all of the added developers and QA teams that are now needed to produce Apps that support multiple mobile platforms instead of simply executing for a mobile browser. And there are millions of them too. Like shiny little bits of candy ready to rot our minds. Insanity all around!

Now many mobile Apps are stand-alone services and I do exaggerate to make a point. Games are fun too. Love my Doodle Jump. I even wrote this on the mobile Evernote app (what a hypocrite I am!).  But we need to stop and think about how this new world of Apps is creating millions of fragmented silos akin to when we lived within the walls of AOL or MSN. They shut out the next generation from the possibilities of a broader experience.

Oh, and I almost forgot, the good news is that some of these Apps will now be free because Apple is going to sell advertising against them. Ads on my bookmarks....fantastic! Who thought of that one? Give them a raise!

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Is this the death of the networks and CableTV as we know it?

As CES winds up in Vegas this week, it will become clear that the 'final 10 feet' between the PC and the TV will finally be bridged. This will all be made possible via the simple inclusion of direct ethernet or wifi connectivity along with software allowing for our new TV's to play compatible digital video such as flash, along with being able to 'speak' browser. No idea why it took manufacturers so long to do this but better late than never.

So what will this mean for the consumer, content creators, the networks, cable companies and the marketing services industry? You can almost guarantee that it will create more upheaval than we can possibly imagine.

For the consumer, long gone will the days be where they will need to navigate to a specific network to watch a show. As with PC's, consumers will search via a browser like interface directly on their TV's and the content will be served directly to them. The consumer will not care or be concerned about which networks serve the content. This will pretty much be the death of networks that do not own IP in the form of content or do not strike exclusive distribution deals directly with content creators. In order to save themselves the cable networks will need to consolidate or merge with the larger media industry or risk becoming dumb pipes that only serve as your ISP.

From the Daily Beast: Sharon Waxman writes: Hollywood is on the “cusp of a new chapter,” in which a smaller group of major entertainment companies, fortified by bigger libraries and deeper distribution channels, will hold a larger concentration of power. With Comcast set to acquire NBC-Universal and Time Warner and News Corp. fighting over MGM, power is being consolidated. Comcast, for example, will have the largest cable subscriber base in the country, plus control of a movie studio, a broadcast TV network, and several cable networks. The combined power of content and distribution, creates a new kind of player.

Either way, all content will be digitally served in an on-demand model and the opportunity for content creators and marketers to distribute directly to consumers via their TV is now a very real option.

On a personal note, I finally cut the cord with Time Warner in Manhattan simply based on the fact that I no longer watch appointment based TV. Between Netflix, Hulu and a few shows purchased via Apples iTunes I am pretty much covered - never having to watch another commercial again, while spending less than half of what I did with cable. Apple is also talking about a subscription based service. Others will do the same.

Net/Net...I would not want to be a network or cable company right now, but I would want to be a content creator or marketer.

Those of you that have followed this blog for a while will know that I have written about this before - in July of 2007: http://jaredhendler.posterous.com/iptv-is-finally-here).  So why repeat myself?.....become this is finally becoming a reality.

A few more articles relevant to this post that may be of interest are below.

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Why the new Kindle should be an Apple Tablet.

Both Apple and Kindle are fierce competitors with almost every other player in the space, both on the hardware, software and content side. A deal like this would make perfect sense.

Amazon has the best purchasing experience and the largest title library (Not counting Google's free archive of classics most people would not want to purchase anyway). Amazon is also not able to manufacture a good quality hardware device over the long term. Their second Kindle (which I own), took everything they had to pull off. The screen is great, but the rest of it is a cheap, non-touch, plastic experience. Amazon knows it needs to stick to what it does best.

Apple designs and delivers killer hardware and software combos. See my blog post on how Apple will be able to deliver the combo of both full-color backlit LCD and digital ink in one device.

I would not be surprised to see the Apple Tablet with it's e-reading experience powered by Amazon.

Amazon may still choose to manufacture a pure reading 'Kindle' device, as the Apple Tablet will obviously offer a lot more and reading will only be a small part of what the product delivers.

But if the two were to do a deal, I would not be surprised if Apple helped Amazon out with design and the best manufacturing supply chain in computing. It may even be a Kindle device powered by Apple for under $100. Apple-Kindle device anyone?

Both Apple and Amazon believe in a more closely guarded environment. This deal would make cultural sense for both companies and catapult them far ahead of everyone else. A killer combination in a quickly evolving competitive marketplace.

I can see Sony prepping for Seppuku (Harakiri) already...

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Friday, December 18, 2009

The Apple Tablet is sure to use Epaper Screens with Color And Video.

In order for Apple and the other tablet manufacturers to put out a device that makes sense as an all purpose reader, they must have e-ink. We have been lead to believe that digital ink technology with a refresh rate powerful enough to drive video does not exist.  Not true.

Take a look at PixelQI's technology that will be driving the Notion Ink Smartpad.  A spin-off from the early inventions of electronic paper, it's combined with an LCD. It's dual-purpose screen behaves much like the e-ink display on an e-reader for daylight, long battery-life performance, but it can also display movies too. It also works as a traditional full-color backlit LCD. These screens rival the best epaper displays on the market today but in addition have video refresh and fully saturated color.  The epaper mode has 3 times the resolution of the fully saturated color mode allowing for a high resolution reading experience without sacrifice to super color fidelity for graphics.

If what is promised can be delivered via the likes of Apple, Kindle and other eBooks may become less prevalent devices than expected, and the Apple's of the world could well take the lead. After all, why carry two devices?

Posted via web from Jared Hendler