Thursday, December 24, 2009

Why the new Kindle should be an Apple Tablet.

Both Apple and Kindle are fierce competitors with almost every other player in the space, both on the hardware, software and content side. A deal like this would make perfect sense.

Amazon has the best purchasing experience and the largest title library (Not counting Google's free archive of classics most people would not want to purchase anyway). Amazon is also not able to manufacture a good quality hardware device over the long term. Their second Kindle (which I own), took everything they had to pull off. The screen is great, but the rest of it is a cheap, non-touch, plastic experience. Amazon knows it needs to stick to what it does best.

Apple designs and delivers killer hardware and software combos. See my blog post on how Apple will be able to deliver the combo of both full-color backlit LCD and digital ink in one device.

I would not be surprised to see the Apple Tablet with it's e-reading experience powered by Amazon.

Amazon may still choose to manufacture a pure reading 'Kindle' device, as the Apple Tablet will obviously offer a lot more and reading will only be a small part of what the product delivers.

But if the two were to do a deal, I would not be surprised if Apple helped Amazon out with design and the best manufacturing supply chain in computing. It may even be a Kindle device powered by Apple for under $100. Apple-Kindle device anyone?

Both Apple and Amazon believe in a more closely guarded environment. This deal would make cultural sense for both companies and catapult them far ahead of everyone else. A killer combination in a quickly evolving competitive marketplace.

I can see Sony prepping for Seppuku (Harakiri) already...

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Monday, December 21, 2009

Avatar...and why it reflects a new reality for us.

This is not a movie review...there are plenty of those. This is my take on how we will evolve with technologies like those that have inspired and made this film possible.

Actors as we know them will cease to exist. The everyday man...the undiscovered talent...the struggling actor, with the gifted inflection of voice, but not necessarily the outward beauty that Hollywood demands will replace them. Companies will emerge that create these complex characters complete with PR campaigns that breath life into these fictitious creations by placing them in the real world. These companies will 'lease' their creations out to the film studios at a much lower cost than the millions that Brad Pitt demands. These same companies will license the right to bring Marilyn Monroe and Jimmy Dean back from the dead...

Gaming will develop to the point where we will be able to insert ourselves into any narrative, via our own avatar, and become part of the experience. Technology will reach the point where we will not even be able to tell the difference. It will be truly immersive. Psychologically this will be our largest challenge as many of us will prefer the invented worlds vs. our own. Some of us already do. As a result, the 'Second Live's' as we know them today may be the precursor for the ultimate parallel universe for those that wish to live 'elsewhere'.

We are already in love with our machines - our technology. Given that, this is not that far of a stretch. If I have children in this lifetime, getting them purposefully involved in gaming may be just as important as learning Chinese, for it will be the way we navigate the emerging world.  Gaming will be the new driver's license and is a lot more complex than learning how to drive a car. So, start early.

Take a read about the new level of interaction on Sony's Playstation platform with the release of Sodium One.

After the Avatar screening, a friend turned to me and said "Wow, she was fantastic. I'm never going to be able to meet anyone like her".  He bought the fantasy and wanted to dive in. You could sense the frustration on his face.

When will all this happen?...it's happening now and the reality of getting lost within another dimension is here.

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Friday, December 18, 2009

The Apple Tablet is sure to use Epaper Screens with Color And Video.

In order for Apple and the other tablet manufacturers to put out a device that makes sense as an all purpose reader, they must have e-ink. We have been lead to believe that digital ink technology with a refresh rate powerful enough to drive video does not exist.  Not true.

Take a look at PixelQI's technology that will be driving the Notion Ink Smartpad.  A spin-off from the early inventions of electronic paper, it's combined with an LCD. It's dual-purpose screen behaves much like the e-ink display on an e-reader for daylight, long battery-life performance, but it can also display movies too. It also works as a traditional full-color backlit LCD. These screens rival the best epaper displays on the market today but in addition have video refresh and fully saturated color.  The epaper mode has 3 times the resolution of the fully saturated color mode allowing for a high resolution reading experience without sacrifice to super color fidelity for graphics.

If what is promised can be delivered via the likes of Apple, Kindle and other eBooks may become less prevalent devices than expected, and the Apple's of the world could well take the lead. After all, why carry two devices?

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Why Live Digital Video is poised to re-Invent Advertising and Online Entertainment...again!

TV commercials used to be live. The thrill of watching the entertainers we loved in real time is what grabbed the viewers of the 50's. With live streaming technologies readily available and affordable - things are about to come full circle, as LIVE is poised to catch our attention again.

With consumers tired of push (pollution messaging as I call it), brands are quickly understanding the necessity of bringing value to their audience. You do not do this with a :30 or any format who's singular purpose is about focusing on your product or service. You also do not do this with a singular message. You do this by thinking about continuous programming. A campaign is no longer a few spots against an expensive media buy over a 6 month period. A campaign is ongoing programming with no end in sight. An ongoing stream of consciousness from the brand that brings value to it's audience. Brands understand their verticals and respective audiences very well and they understand what they want. All they need to do is bring valuable content and engage their audience in their respective interests within that vertical. The product should be a by-product so-to-speak, not the focus.

Lets take an idea that is as old as TV itself. The celebrity endorsement. Lets tie the celebrity to a brand, maybe even one that cares about or is involved in cause marketing that aligns with the brand. Now lets give the celebrity free reign (yes, free reign), to broadcast live anytime they want to from wherever they are, cause related or otherwise. All of a sudden the idea of a fan being able to catch their favorite celebrity or live progress related to their favorite cause campaign becomes a must watch. An exclusive moment. An extension of reality TV, but with focus, celebrity and purpose - along with all of the spontaneous (and sometimes embarrassing moments yes) that the brand can stomach. Match that all up with live FB and Twitter feeds allowing fans to participate and you get the picture.

Those of you that have a Ustream account know the power of their new broadcasting application enabling anyone to broadcast video live from your iPhone.

Live formats will also be taken advantage of again by online media and new entertainment companies -  not just advertisers.  On a related note, Ashton Kutcher and Katalyst Ent are making some waves this morning with the announcement of his :30 min live 'variety' show broadcast from the Katalyst offices in LA. As much as many people think this is a gimmick, given my opinions on the above, I think Kutcher is onto something.  At least he is giving the format a shot. Kutcher has already been experimenting with KatalystHQ, short episodes of his office.  I real live version of 'The Office'. KatalystHQ has some of the highest viewings online and so this is the next logical step. Today it is all about exploration and iteration and regardless of whether this works or not it will continue to place Katalyst in a great position. Read more about the event here: Ashton Kutcher's Live Webvids: Genius New Format or Celeb Desperation?

The leaders in the live streaming space for now are:

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Monday, December 14, 2009

Enough already...there is no Google Phone (Nexus One)!

Why? Because Google is not a hardware manufacturing company people! I am more than willing to bet that all this is about is Google giving their staff access to the latest Android OS coupled with the best partner hardware in Alpha stage for testing and PR purposes. If I am wrong...great!  But then Google is making a big mistake working with a partner.  If they want to do this right - they should be prepared to staff their own ID dept, source their own manufacturing supply chain etc.  Either way, this will be fun to watch.

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Imagine hooking up actions in kids toys to Twitter....mommy knows exactly what you are doing!

That is exactly what a group of folks at Belgium's Hasselt University have done.  Application for this is endless.  Great spin on a simple idea. Video speaks for itself or read the full article in FastCompany.

<p>INCA Award 2009 WINNER: Twoddler from IBBT on Vimeo.</p>

Posted via web from Jared Hendler

Sunday, December 06, 2009

How Will Journalism Survive the Internet Age?

The Federal Trade Commission held two days of workshops on this very subject matter this past week on December 1 to explore how the Internet has affected journalism. The event was free and open to the public. The workshop assembled representatives from print, online, broadcast and cable news organizations, academics, consumer advocates, bloggers, and other new media representatives.

We all know the industry is scrambling. Not a week goes by whereby a new publisher consolidates or closes its doors. Survival clearly will depend on evolving....and fast!

But in what directions? I'll offer a few thoughts here.

Curate content. Don't just rely on your own. The consumer knows that marquee content gets floated to many news organizations for repurposing. Be seen as the leading curator for your vertical in addition to providing insights within your own original content.

Conversations surrounding your content often outlive the content itself and the reason we consume media in the first place. Be a safe harbor for the conversations and participate in them. Play nice with others such as Twitter, Netvibes, Bloggers, Facebook and yes, even Google.

Netvibes, a startup based Paris, France, that lets users build custom home pages, is testing a service that pulls together real-time data from Twitter and Facebook, as well as frequently updated blogs and news sites, on personalized home pages. Called Wasabi, the new service is built on technology that helps keep up with an avalanche of real-time information from across the Web.

Once you activate Wasabi, you can choose a "smart reader" view in the upper-right corner of the screen. This view consolidates previously separate RSS boxes into a stream of intermingled headlines. Twitter and Facebook updates and other information, such as the current weather and e-mails, are shown in the same feed.

Distribute your content. Organizations should not care where the consumer interacts with the content, only that they do. Monetization is a key factor in this and the industry needs to coordinate revenue sharing models amongst it's own. Don't give it away and share in the wealth.

The Tablets are coming...and lots of them but don't be something that you are not. I was horrified to read that Sports Illustrated was considering releasing it's own tablet. Anyone remember the ESPN mobile phone fiasco? Time Warner is a content company, not a hardware manufacturing company.
The problem with this is that consumers will need a device that can read ALL magazines. They do not want devices specific to magazines or to publishing houses. Amazon doing this makes sense as it is a technology company and has no interest in producing the content. Time Inc doing this does not - it should be a technology agnostic content company.  Get it?

And then there is AOL's seed.com. An exciting and innovative new platform that will allow writers, photographers and videographers to participate in creating great content across AOL's network of industry leading websites. This is a great example of the very way that content creation is evolving.

As I settle into my Sunday read of traditional publications via my Kindle subscriptions and content via my Mac, I am swayed heavily by what I am subscribed to within Alltop, Twitter follow recommends, Delicious, Stumblepon, Tumblr, Posterous subscriptions and the like...

My only regret is no longer having leftover newspaper for my fireplace on a cold winter's night.

More fun and games from some recent headlines on this subject from the last week are below.

Group of Magazine Publishers Is Said to Be Building an Online Newsstand

Posted via web from Jared Hendler